abacus: has quality definition

Related concepts

Parents	instrument Weight: 0.50 , tool Weight: 0.48 , calculator Weight: 0.47 , mathematics Weight: 0.44 , software Weight: 0.43
Siblings	pencil sharpener Weight: 0.32 , spreadsheet Weight: 0.31 , debt instrument Weight: 0.31 , xylophone Weight: 0.31 , negotiable instrument Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality definition	1.00
has quality system	0.77
has quality good	0.76
has quality bad	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(calculator, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(abacus, has quality definition)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(abacus, has quality definition)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(instrument, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(abacus, has quality definition)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(instrument, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(calculator, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(instrument, has quality good)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(pencil sharpener, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality definition)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(calculator, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(abacus, has quality definition)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(abacus, has quality definition)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(instrument, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(abacus, has quality definition)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(debt instrument, has quality definition)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(debt instrument, has quality good)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(negotiable instrument, has quality good)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(pencil sharpener, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(pencil sharpener, has quality good)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(abacus, has quality definition)

Similarity expansion

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(abacus, has quality system)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(abacus, has quality bad)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(abacus, has quality system)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(abacus, has quality system)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(abacus, has quality bad)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(abacus, has quality bad)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality bad)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(abacus, has quality definition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(calculator, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(debt instrument, has quality definition)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(debt instrument, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(spreadsheet, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(negotiable instrument, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(spreadsheet, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(pencil sharpener, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(abacus, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(calculator, has quality good)