abacus: was used in times

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.50
, tool
Weight: 0.48
, calculator
Weight: 0.47
, mathematics
Weight: 0.44
, software
Weight: 0.43
Siblings pencil sharpener
Weight: 0.32
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.31
, debt instrument
Weight: 0.31
, xylophone
Weight: 0.31
, negotiable instrument
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
was used in times 1.00
was used in ancient times 0.88
is used for 0.83
is is used 0.81
have have used 0.81
being is used 0.80
be used 0.80
be used today 0.77
be used in life situations 0.77
be are used on ways 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tool, have have used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(abacus, was used in times)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(tool, is used for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(abacus, was used in times)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tool, is is used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(abacus, was used in times)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tool, being is used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(abacus, was used in times)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tool, is is used)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(tool, is used for)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tool, being is used)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(tool, have have used)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, have have used)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(tool, is used for)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tool, is is used)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tool, being is used)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, is used for)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, be used in life situations)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, be used)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(tool, is used for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(abacus, was used in times)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tool, is is used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(abacus, was used in times)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(tool, have have used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(abacus, was used in times)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tool, being is used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(abacus, was used in times)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(spreadsheet, is used for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, is used for)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(spreadsheet, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, be used)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(spreadsheet, be used in life situations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, be used in life situations)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(abacus, was used in times)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(abacus, was used in ancient times)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(abacus, is used for)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(abacus, be used today)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(abacus, be used today)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(abacus, is used for)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(abacus, is used for)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(abacus, be used today)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(abacus, be used today)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(abacus, is used for)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(abacus, was used in ancient times)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(abacus, was used in ancient times)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(abacus, was used in ancient times)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(abacus, was used in times)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(abacus, was used in times)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tool, is is used)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tool, being is used)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(tool, is used for)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(tool, have have used)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, be used)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, is used for)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, be used in life situations)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tool, is is used)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(tool, is used for)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tool, being is used)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(abacus, was used in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(tool, have have used)