abc: be different from traditional costing system

Property	Similarity
be different from traditional costing system	1.00
be different from costing system	0.96
be better than traditional costing	0.95
be better than costing	0.89
be different from traditional system	0.89
be different from system	0.83
cost more accurate	0.75

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(abc, be different from traditional costing system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(abc, be better than traditional costing)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(abc, be different from traditional costing system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(abc, be different from costing system)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(abc, be different from traditional costing system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(abc, be different from traditional system)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(abc, be different from traditional costing system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(abc, be better than costing)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(abc, be different from traditional costing system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(abc, be different from traditional system)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(abc, be different from traditional costing system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(abc, be different from costing system)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(abc, be different from traditional costing system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(abc, be different from costing system)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(abc, be different from traditional costing system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(abc, be different from costing system)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(abc, be different from traditional costing system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(abc, be different from traditional system)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(abc, be different from traditional costing system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(abc, be different from system)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(abc, be different from traditional costing system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(abc, be different from system)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(abc, be different from traditional costing system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(abc, be better than traditional costing)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(abc, be different from traditional costing system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(abc, be better than traditional costing)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(abc, be different from traditional costing system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(abc, be different from traditional system)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(abc, be different from traditional costing system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(abc, cost more accurate)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(abc, be different from traditional costing system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(abc, be different from system)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(abc, be different from traditional costing system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(abc, be different from system)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(abc, be different from traditional costing system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(abc, be better than traditional costing)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(abc, be different from traditional costing system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(abc, be better than costing)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(abc, be different from traditional costing system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(abc, be better than costing)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(abc, be different from traditional costing system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(abc, be better than costing)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(abc, be different from traditional costing system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(abc, cost more accurate)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(abc, be different from traditional costing system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(abc, cost more accurate)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(abc, be different from traditional costing system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(abc, cost more accurate)

Parents	channel Weight: 0.63 , tv show Weight: 0.62 , radio station Weight: 0.58 , corporation Weight: 0.58 , company Weight: 0.57
Siblings	cnn Weight: 0.35 , kate Weight: 0.35 , sherlock holmes Weight: 0.35 , smallville Weight: 0.34 , simpsons Weight: 0.34

abc: be different from traditional costing system

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible