abc: be different from traditional system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents channel
Weight: 0.63
, tv show
Weight: 0.62
, radio station
Weight: 0.58
, corporation
Weight: 0.58
, company
Weight: 0.57
Siblings cnn
Weight: 0.35
, kate
Weight: 0.35
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.35
, smallville
Weight: 0.34
, simpsons
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from traditional system 1.00
be different from system 0.90
be different from traditional costing system 0.89
be better than traditional costing 0.80
be different from costing system 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(abc, be different from traditional system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(abc, be different from traditional system)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(abc, be different from traditional system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(abc, be different from system)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(abc, be different from traditional system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(abc, be different from traditional costing system)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(abc, be different from traditional system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(abc, be better than traditional costing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(abc, be different from traditional system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(abc, be different from costing system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(abc, be different from traditional system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(abc, be different from system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(abc, be different from traditional system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(abc, be different from traditional costing system)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(abc, be different from traditional system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(abc, be different from system)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(abc, be different from traditional system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(abc, be different from system)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(abc, be different from traditional system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(abc, be different from traditional costing system)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(abc, be different from traditional system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(abc, be different from traditional costing system)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(abc, be different from traditional system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(abc, be different from costing system)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(abc, be different from traditional system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(abc, be better than traditional costing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(abc, be different from traditional system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(abc, be different from costing system)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(abc, be different from traditional system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(abc, be better than traditional costing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(abc, be different from traditional system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(abc, be different from costing system)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(abc, be different from traditional system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(abc, be better than traditional costing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(abc, be different from traditional system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(abc, be different from traditional system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(abc, be different from traditional system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(abc, be different from traditional system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(abc, be different from traditional system)