abdominal: is fat bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aneurysm
Weight: 0.46
, muscle
Weight: 0.44
, pain
Weight: 0.36
, body
Weight: 0.35
, spine
Weight: 0.35
Siblings oblique
Weight: 0.36
, triceps
Weight: 0.32
, biceps
Weight: 0.31
, cardiac muscle
Weight: 0.31
, deltoid
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is fat bad 1.00
is fat dangerous 0.92
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(abdominal, is fat bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(abdominal, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(pain, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(abdominal, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pain, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pain, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(abdominal, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(abdominal, is fat bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(abdominal, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(abdominal, is fat bad)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(abdominal, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(abdominal, is fat dangerous)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(abdominal, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(abdominal, is fat dangerous)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(abdominal, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(abdominal, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(abdominal, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(abdominal, is fat dangerous)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(abdominal, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(abdominal, is fat dangerous)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(abdominal, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(abdominal, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(abdominal, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(abdominal, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(abdominal, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(abdominal, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(abdominal, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(abdominal, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(abdominal, is fat bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(abdominal, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(abdominal, is fat bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(abdominal, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pain, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(abdominal, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pain, has quality bad)