abigail: lie about dancing in forest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.57
, girl
Weight: 0.47
, character
Weight: 0.47
, man
Weight: 0.45
, person
Weight: 0.44
Siblings sylvia plath
Weight: 0.33
, helen
Weight: 0.33
, sarah
Weight: 0.33
, elizabeth
Weight: 0.33
, kate
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
lie about dancing in forest 1.00
lie about dancing 0.94
lie 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(man, lie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(abigail, lie about dancing in forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(abigail, lie about dancing in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(man, lie)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(abigail, lie about dancing in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(man, lie)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(man, lie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(abigail, lie about dancing in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(abigail, lie about dancing in forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(abigail, lie about dancing in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(abigail, lie about dancing in forest)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(abigail, lie about dancing in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(abigail, lie)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(abigail, lie about dancing in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(abigail, lie)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(abigail, lie about dancing in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(abigail, lie)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(abigail, lie about dancing in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(abigail, lie)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(abigail, lie about dancing in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(abigail, lie about dancing in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(abigail, lie about dancing in forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(abigail, lie about dancing in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(abigail, lie about dancing in forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(abigail, lie about dancing in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(man, lie)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(abigail, lie about dancing in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(man, lie)