abortion: be considered womens rights issue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surgical procedure
Weight: 0.65
, atrocity
Weight: 0.62
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, contraceptive
Weight: 0.60
, subject
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hysterectomy
Weight: 0.35
, mastectomy
Weight: 0.34
, circumcision
Weight: 0.34
, vasectomy
Weight: 0.34
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered womens rights issue 1.00
be considered women 's rights issue 0.95
is women 's rights issue 0.94
be women 's health issue 0.85
be considered as social issue 0.81
be such issue for feminists 0.80
be considered as issue 0.80
is feminist issue 0.79
is social issue 0.79
is issue 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be considered as social issue)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(crime, be considered as social issue)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(crime, be considered as social issue)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, is issue)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be considered as social issue)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(plastic surgery, is issue)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, is issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(abortion, be considered women 's rights issue)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(abortion, be considered women 's rights issue)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(abortion, be considered women 's rights issue)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(abortion, be considered women 's rights issue)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(abortion, is women 's rights issue)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(abortion, be such issue for feminists)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(abortion, is women 's rights issue)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(abortion, be such issue for feminists)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(abortion, is women 's rights issue)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(abortion, be women 's health issue)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(abortion, be such issue for feminists)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(abortion, is women 's rights issue)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(abortion, be such issue for feminists)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(abortion, be women 's health issue)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(abortion, be women 's health issue)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(abortion, be women 's health issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(crime, be considered as social issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, is issue)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(abortion, be considered womens rights issue)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(crime, be considered as social issue)