abrasion: has physical part facial

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trauma
Weight: 0.60
, injury
Weight: 0.60
, effect
Weight: 0.54
, chemical
Weight: 0.54
, problem
Weight: 0.53
Siblings scratch
Weight: 0.56
, callus
Weight: 0.42
, laceration
Weight: 0.35
, fracture
Weight: 0.34
, whiplash
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part facial 1.00
has physical part knee 0.78
has physical part process 0.78
has physical part elbow 0.77
be in skin 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(chemical, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(abrasion, has physical part facial)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(injury, be in skin)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(abrasion, has physical part facial)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(abrasion, has physical part facial)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(injury, be in skin)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(abrasion, has physical part facial)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(chemical, has physical part process)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has physical part facial)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(injury, be in skin)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has physical part facial)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chemical, has physical part process)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has physical part facial)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fracture, has physical part knee)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has physical part facial)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fracture, has physical part elbow)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(chemical, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(abrasion, has physical part facial)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(abrasion, has physical part facial)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(injury, be in skin)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(abrasion, has physical part facial)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(abrasion, has physical part facial)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(abrasion, has physical part facial)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(fracture, has physical part elbow)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(fracture, has physical part elbow)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(abrasion, has physical part facial)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fracture, has physical part knee)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(fracture, has physical part knee)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(abrasion, has physical part facial)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(abrasion, has physical part facial)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(abrasion, has physical part facial)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(abrasion, has physical part facial)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has physical part facial)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(abrasion, has physical part facial)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(abrasion, has physical part facial)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has physical part facial)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(chemical, has physical part process)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has physical part facial)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(injury, be in skin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has physical part facial)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fracture, has physical part elbow)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has physical part facial)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(fracture, has physical part knee)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(abrasion, has physical part facial)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(chemical, has physical part process)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(abrasion, has physical part facial)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(injury, be in skin)