abrasion: is noun

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trauma
Weight: 0.60
, injury
Weight: 0.60
, effect
Weight: 0.54
, chemical
Weight: 0.54
, problem
Weight: 0.53
Siblings scratch
Weight: 0.56
, callus
Weight: 0.42
, laceration
Weight: 0.35
, fracture
Weight: 0.34
, whiplash
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is noun 1.00
is onomatopoeia 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, is noun)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(scratch, is onomatopoeia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(abrasion, is noun)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(scratch, is onomatopoeia)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(scratch, is onomatopoeia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(abrasion, is noun)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(abrasion, is noun)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(abrasion, is noun)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(abrasion, is noun)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, is noun)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(abrasion, is noun)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(abrasion, is noun)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, is noun)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(scratch, is onomatopoeia)