absorption: has state complex

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.59
, loss
Weight: 0.59
, condition
Weight: 0.55
, process
Weight: 0.55
, compound
Weight: 0.54
Siblings absorption spectrum
Weight: 0.35
, digestion
Weight: 0.33
, solubility
Weight: 0.33
, dispersion
Weight: 0.33
, attenuation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state complex 1.00
is more complex 0.92
be more complex than carbohydrates 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(absorption, has state complex)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(digestion, be more complex than carbohydrates)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(absorption, has state complex)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(digestion, be more complex than carbohydrates)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(digestion, be more complex than carbohydrates)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(absorption, has state complex)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(absorption, has state complex)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(absorption, has state complex)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(absorption, is more complex)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(absorption, has state complex)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(absorption, is more complex)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(absorption, has state complex)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(absorption, is more complex)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(absorption, has state complex)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(absorption, be more complex than carbohydrates)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(absorption, has state complex)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(absorption, be more complex than carbohydrates)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(absorption, has state complex)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(absorption, be more complex than carbohydrates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(absorption, has state complex)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(absorption, is more complex)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(absorption, has state complex)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(absorption, be more complex than carbohydrates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(absorption, has state complex)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(absorption, has state complex)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(absorption, has state complex)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(absorption, has state complex)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(absorption, has state complex)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(absorption, has state complex)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(digestion, be more complex than carbohydrates)