academic: has quality honesty

Related concepts

Parents	individual Weight: 0.62 , activity Weight: 0.59 , aspect Weight: 0.59 , institution Weight: 0.58 , discipline Weight: 0.57
Siblings	financial institution Weight: 0.35 , secondary school Weight: 0.34 , educational system Weight: 0.33 , business activity Weight: 0.33 , institute Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality honesty	1.00
is integrity	0.83
has quality good	0.79
has quality bad	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(academic, has quality honesty)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(aspect, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(academic, has quality honesty)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(discipline, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(academic, has quality honesty)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(aspect, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(aspect, has quality bad)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality bad)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(academic, has quality honesty)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(aspect, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(academic, has quality honesty)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(discipline, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(academic, has quality honesty)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(institute, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(institute, has quality good)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(institute, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(institute, has quality bad)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(academic, has quality honesty)

Similarity expansion

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(academic, is integrity)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(academic, is integrity)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(academic, is integrity)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(academic, has quality good)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(academic, has quality good)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality good)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(academic, has quality good)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(academic, is integrity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality honesty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(academic, has quality honesty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(discipline, has quality bad)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(institute, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(institute, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(discipline, has quality bad)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(academic, has quality honesty) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)