academic: is paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents individual
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, aspect
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.58
, discipline
Weight: 0.57
Siblings financial institution
Weight: 0.35
, secondary school
Weight: 0.34
, educational system
Weight: 0.33
, business activity
Weight: 0.33
, institute
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid 1.00
is paid little 0.90
pay taxes 0.77
pay tax 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(individual, pay taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(academic, is paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(academic, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(individual, pay taxes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(academic, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(individual, pay taxes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(individual, pay taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(academic, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(academic, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(academic, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(academic, is paid)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(academic, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(academic, is paid little)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(academic, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(academic, is paid little)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(academic, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(academic, is paid little)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(academic, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(academic, is paid little)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(academic, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(academic, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(academic, is paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(academic, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(academic, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(academic, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(individual, pay taxes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(academic, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(individual, pay taxes)