academic: is poor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents individual
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, aspect
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.58
, discipline
Weight: 0.57
Siblings financial institution
Weight: 0.35
, secondary school
Weight: 0.34
, educational system
Weight: 0.33
, business activity
Weight: 0.33
, institute
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is poor 1.00
has quality bad 0.78
be weak in schools 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(discipline, be weak in schools)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(academic, is poor)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(aspect, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(academic, is poor)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(discipline, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(academic, is poor)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(aspect, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(discipline, be weak in schools)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aspect, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(discipline, be weak in schools)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(aspect, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(academic, is poor)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(discipline, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(academic, is poor)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(discipline, be weak in schools)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(academic, is poor)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(institute, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(institute, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(academic, is poor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(academic, is poor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(academic, is poor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(discipline, be weak in schools)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(institute, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(academic, is poor)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(discipline, be weak in schools)