accent: evolve in language

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents color
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, detail
Weight: 0.57
, language
Weight: 0.56
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings american english
Weight: 0.59
, irish
Weight: 0.55
, british
Weight: 0.53
, welsh
Weight: 0.48
, lisp
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
evolve in language 1.00
evolve over time 0.86
devolop in language 0.83
be formed in same languages 0.78
using sign language 0.77
develop 0.76
be in languages 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(language, develop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(accent, evolve in language)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(language, develop)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(language, develop)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(lisp, develop)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(language, develop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(accent, evolve in language)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(lisp, develop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(lisp, develop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(accent, evolve in language)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(accent, evolve over time)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(accent, devolop in language)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(accent, be formed in same languages)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(accent, devolop in language)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(accent, using sign language)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(accent, develop)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(accent, be in languages)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(accent, using sign language)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(accent, evolve over time)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(accent, be in languages)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(accent, devolop in language)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(accent, be in languages)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(accent, using sign language)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(accent, evolve over time)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(accent, devolop in language)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(accent, be in languages)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(accent, evolve over time)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(accent, develop)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(accent, using sign language)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(accent, be formed in same languages)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(accent, be formed in same languages)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(accent, develop)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(accent, develop)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(accent, be formed in same languages)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(accent, evolve in language)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(accent, evolve in language)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(language, develop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lisp, develop)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(accent, evolve in language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(language, develop)