acceptance: is hard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.60
, change
Weight: 0.60
, quality
Weight: 0.59
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, achievement
Weight: 0.56
Siblings recognition
Weight: 0.33
, satisfaction
Weight: 0.32
, success
Weight: 0.32
, loyalty
Weight: 0.32
, enthusiasm
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hard 1.00
is good bad thing 0.76
is good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(change, is hard)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(acceptance, is hard)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(matter, is hard)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(acceptance, is hard)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(concept, is hard)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(acceptance, is hard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(concept, is hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(matter, is hard)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(change, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(matter, is hard)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(concept, is hard)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(change, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(success, is hard)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, is hard)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, is good thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(change, is hard)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(acceptance, is hard)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(matter, is hard)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(acceptance, is hard)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(concept, is hard)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(acceptance, is hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(loyalty, is hard)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(loyalty, is hard)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(success, is hard)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(success, is hard)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(loyalty, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(loyalty, is good thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(acceptance, is hard)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, is good bad thing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(acceptance, is good bad thing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(acceptance, is good bad thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(acceptance, is good thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, is good thing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(acceptance, is good thing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(acceptance, is good thing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(acceptance, is good bad thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, is hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(acceptance, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(concept, is hard)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(matter, is hard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(change, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(loyalty, is hard)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(success, is hard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(loyalty, is good thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(concept, is hard)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(matter, is hard)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(acceptance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(change, is hard)