access: be called relational database

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents security system
Weight: 0.61
, location
Weight: 0.59
, consideration
Weight: 0.59
, service
Weight: 0.59
Siblings easement
Weight: 0.59
, key
Weight: 0.57
, egress
Weight: 0.40
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.35
, escort service
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called relational database 1.00
is relational database 1.00
be important in databases 0.85
be good for databases 0.84
be needed in transactional replication 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(access, be called relational database)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(key, be important in databases)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(access, be called relational database)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(key, be needed in transactional replication)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(access, be called relational database)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(key, be important in databases)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(key, be important in databases)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(access, be called relational database)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(key, be needed in transactional replication)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(key, be needed in transactional replication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(access, be called relational database)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(access, be called relational database)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(access, be called relational database)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(access, is relational database)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(access, be called relational database)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(access, be good for databases)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(access, be called relational database)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(access, is relational database)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(access, be called relational database)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(access, be good for databases)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(access, be called relational database)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(access, is relational database)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(access, be called relational database)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(access, be good for databases)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(access, be called relational database)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(access, be good for databases)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(access, be called relational database)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(access, is relational database)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(access, be called relational database)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(access, be called relational database)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(access, be called relational database)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(access, be called relational database)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(access, be called relational database)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(access, be called relational database)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(key, be important in databases)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(access, be called relational database)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(key, be needed in transactional replication)