accident: be treated in classified situations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tragedy
Weight: 0.64
, emergency
Weight: 0.64
, condition
Weight: 0.63
, crime
Weight: 0.62
, situation
Weight: 0.61
Siblings plane crash
Weight: 0.77
, car accident
Weight: 0.77
, crash
Weight: 0.70
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68
, spill
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be treated in classified situations 1.00
be treated in situations 0.95
be classified 0.83
is classified 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(crime, be classified)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(accident, be treated in classified situations)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(accident, be treated in classified situations)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(crime, be classified)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(accident, be treated in classified situations)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(crime, be classified)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(crime, be classified)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(accident, be treated in classified situations)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(accident, be treated in classified situations)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(accident, be treated in classified situations)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(accident, be treated in classified situations)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(accident, be treated in classified situations)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(accident, be treated in situations)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(accident, be treated in classified situations)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(accident, be treated in situations)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(accident, be treated in classified situations)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(accident, be treated in situations)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(accident, be treated in classified situations)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(accident, be treated in situations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(accident, be treated in classified situations)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(accident, be treated in classified situations)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(accident, be treated in classified situations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(accident, be treated in classified situations)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(accident, be treated in classified situations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(accident, be treated in classified situations)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(crime, be classified)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(accident, be treated in classified situations)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(crime, be classified)