accident: occur at construction sites in malaysia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tragedy
Weight: 0.64
, emergency
Weight: 0.64
, condition
Weight: 0.63
, crime
Weight: 0.62
, situation
Weight: 0.61
Siblings plane crash
Weight: 0.77
, car accident
Weight: 0.77
, crash
Weight: 0.70
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68
, spill
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
occur at construction sites in malaysia 1.00
occur at construction sites 0.87
occur in uk 0.83
rise in uk 0.77
increase in uk 0.77
happen in construction 0.76
is uk 0.76
be in india 0.76
were important in australia between 1901-1914 0.75
occur in areas 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(condition, were important in australia between 1901-1914)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, rise in uk)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(crime, increase in uk)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(crime, increase in uk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(crime, rise in uk)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(condition, were important in australia between 1901-1914)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(crime, increase in uk)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(crime, rise in uk)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(condition, were important in australia between 1901-1914)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(car accident, occur in uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(condition, were important in australia between 1901-1914)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, rise in uk)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(crime, increase in uk)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(car accident, occur in uk)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(car accident, occur in uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(accident, occur at construction sites)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(accident, occur at construction sites)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(accident, occur at construction sites)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(accident, happen in construction)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(accident, happen in construction)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(accident, happen in construction)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(accident, is uk)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(accident, is uk)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(accident, is uk)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(accident, is uk)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(accident, occur at construction sites)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(accident, happen in construction)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(crime, rise in uk)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(crime, increase in uk)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(condition, were important in australia between 1901-1914)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(car accident, occur in uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(crime, rise in uk)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(crime, increase in uk)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(accident, occur at construction sites in malaysia)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(condition, were important in australia between 1901-1914)