accident: were in factories common

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tragedy
Weight: 0.64
, emergency
Weight: 0.64
, condition
Weight: 0.63
, crime
Weight: 0.62
, situation
Weight: 0.61
Siblings plane crash
Weight: 0.77
, car accident
Weight: 0.77
, crash
Weight: 0.70
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68
, spill
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
were in factories common 1.00
were in factories common in 1800s 1.00
were in factories common in late 1800s 0.97
were in factories in 1800s 0.96
were in factories 0.96
were in factories in late 1800s 0.94
be more common in cities 0.78
be more common in areas 0.77
affect plants 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(spill, affect plants)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(spill, affect plants)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(spill, affect plants)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(accident, were in factories common)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(accident, were in factories in 1800s)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(accident, were in factories in late 1800s)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(accident, were in factories)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(accident, were in factories)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(accident, were in factories common in 1800s)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(accident, were in factories)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(accident, were in factories common in late 1800s)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(accident, were in factories in 1800s)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(accident, were in factories)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(accident, were in factories in late 1800s)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(accident, were in factories in 1800s)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(accident, were in factories in late 1800s)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(accident, were in factories in 1800s)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(accident, were in factories common in 1800s)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(accident, were in factories common in 1800s)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(accident, were in factories common in 1800s)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(accident, were in factories in late 1800s)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(accident, were in factories common in late 1800s)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(accident, were in factories common in late 1800s)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(accident, were in factories common in late 1800s)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(accident, were in factories common)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(accident, were in factories common)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(accident, were in factories common)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(spill, affect plants)