accommodation: be at inn

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents space
Weight: 0.59
, preparation
Weight: 0.59
, treatment
Weight: 0.59
, benefit
Weight: 0.55
Siblings restaurant
Weight: 0.64
, cottage
Weight: 0.62
, cabin
Weight: 0.60
, meal
Weight: 0.59
, campsite
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at inn 1.00
be at hotel 0.78
be at motel 0.77
be at fast-food restaurant 0.75
be at restaurant 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be at inn)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(meal, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be at inn)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be at inn)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be at inn)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(accommodation, be at inn)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(meal, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(meal, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(accommodation, be at inn)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(accommodation, be at inn)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(restaurant, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(accommodation, be at inn)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(restaurant, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(accommodation, be at inn)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(accommodation, be at inn)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(accommodation, be at inn)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(accommodation, be at motel)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(accommodation, be at inn)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(accommodation, be at hotel)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(accommodation, be at inn)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(accommodation, be at motel)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(accommodation, be at inn)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(accommodation, be at hotel)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(accommodation, be at inn)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be at motel)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(accommodation, be at inn)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be at hotel)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(accommodation, be at inn)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(accommodation, be at hotel)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(accommodation, be at inn)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(accommodation, be at motel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(accommodation, be at inn)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(accommodation, be at inn)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be at inn)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(accommodation, be at inn)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(accommodation, be at inn)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be at inn)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be at inn)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be at inn)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be at inn)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(meal, be at fast-food restaurant)