accountant: be important to corporation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.63
, specialist
Weight: 0.63
, financial institution
Weight: 0.63
, department
Weight: 0.60
, professional
Weight: 0.59
Siblings cpa
Weight: 0.53
, lawyer
Weight: 0.35
, stockbroker
Weight: 0.35
, banker
Weight: 0.34
, paralegal
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to corporation 1.00
be important to business 0.77
be important in business 0.76
be important for business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(accountant, be important to corporation)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(accountant, be important to corporation)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(accountant, be important to corporation)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(accountant, be important to business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(accountant, be important to corporation)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(accountant, be important in business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(accountant, be important to corporation)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(accountant, be important for business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(accountant, be important to corporation)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(accountant, be important in business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(accountant, be important to corporation)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(accountant, be important to business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(accountant, be important to corporation)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(accountant, be important for business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(accountant, be important to corporation)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(accountant, be important to business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(accountant, be important to corporation)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(accountant, be important in business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(accountant, be important to corporation)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(accountant, be important to business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(accountant, be important to corporation)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(accountant, be important for business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(accountant, be important to corporation)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(accountant, be important in business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(accountant, be important to corporation)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(accountant, be important for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(accountant, be important to corporation)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(accountant, be important to corporation)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(accountant, be important to corporation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(accountant, be important to corporation)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(accountant, be important to corporation)