accountant: be in demand

Related concepts

Parents	person Weight: 0.63 , specialist Weight: 0.63 , financial institution Weight: 0.63 , department Weight: 0.60 , professional Weight: 0.59
Siblings	cpa Weight: 0.53 , lawyer Weight: 0.35 , stockbroker Weight: 0.35 , banker Weight: 0.34 , paralegal Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be in demand	1.00
be in high demand	0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(accountant, be in demand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(accountant, be in demand)

Similarity expansion

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(accountant, be in demand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(accountant, be in high demand)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(accountant, be in demand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(accountant, be in high demand)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(accountant, be in demand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(accountant, be in high demand)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(accountant, be in demand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(accountant, be in high demand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(accountant, be in demand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(accountant, be in demand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(accountant, be in demand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(accountant, be in demand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(accountant, be in demand)