accountant: decide when recognize

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.63
, specialist
Weight: 0.63
, financial institution
Weight: 0.63
, department
Weight: 0.60
, professional
Weight: 0.59
Siblings cpa
Weight: 0.53
, lawyer
Weight: 0.35
, stockbroker
Weight: 0.35
, banker
Weight: 0.34
, paralegal
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
decide when recognize 1.00
need understand 0.82
do 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(accountant, decide when recognize)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cpa, do)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(accountant, decide when recognize)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(banker, do)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(accountant, decide when recognize)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, do)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(accountant, decide when recognize)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(lawyer, do)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(lawyer, do)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(accountant, decide when recognize)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(cpa, do)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cpa, do)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(accountant, decide when recognize)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(banker, do)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(banker, do)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(accountant, decide when recognize)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(accountant, decide when recognize)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(accountant, decide when recognize)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(accountant, need understand)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(accountant, decide when recognize)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(accountant, do)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(accountant, decide when recognize)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(accountant, do)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(accountant, decide when recognize)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(accountant, do)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(accountant, decide when recognize)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(accountant, need understand)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(accountant, decide when recognize)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(accountant, need understand)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(accountant, decide when recognize)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(accountant, do)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(accountant, decide when recognize)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(accountant, need understand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(accountant, decide when recognize)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(accountant, decide when recognize)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(accountant, decide when recognize)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(accountant, decide when recognize)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(accountant, decide when recognize)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(accountant, decide when recognize)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(lawyer, do)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(accountant, decide when recognize)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(cpa, do)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(accountant, decide when recognize)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(banker, do)