accountant: do

Related concepts

Parents	person Weight: 0.63 , specialist Weight: 0.63 , financial institution Weight: 0.63 , department Weight: 0.60 , professional Weight: 0.59
Siblings	cpa Weight: 0.53 , lawyer Weight: 0.35 , stockbroker Weight: 0.35 , banker Weight: 0.34 , paralegal Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
do	1.00
need understand	0.83
mean	0.77
decide when recognize	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(department, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(accountant, do)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(professional, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(accountant, do)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(professional, mean)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(department, mean)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(professional, mean)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(department, mean)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(cpa, do)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(banker, do)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(lawyer, do)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(paralegal, mean)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(department, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(accountant, do)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(professional, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(accountant, do)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(lawyer, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(lawyer, do)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(cpa, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(cpa, do)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(banker, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(banker, do)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(paralegal, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(paralegal, mean)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Salient(accountant, do)

Similarity expansion

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(accountant, mean)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(accountant, decide when recognize)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(accountant, need understand)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(accountant, need understand)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.26

Salient(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(accountant, mean)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(accountant, mean)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(accountant, need understand)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(accountant, mean)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.26

Salient(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(accountant, need understand)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.26

Salient(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(accountant, decide when recognize)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(accountant, decide when recognize)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(accountant, decide when recognize)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Salient(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(accountant, do)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(accountant, do)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(department, mean)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(professional, mean)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(lawyer, do)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(cpa, do)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(banker, do)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(paralegal, mean)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(department, mean)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(accountant, do) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(professional, mean)