accountant: need good writing skills

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.63
, specialist
Weight: 0.63
, financial institution
Weight: 0.63
, department
Weight: 0.60
, professional
Weight: 0.59
Siblings cpa
Weight: 0.53
, lawyer
Weight: 0.35
, stockbroker
Weight: 0.35
, banker
Weight: 0.34
, paralegal
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
need good writing skills 1.00
need communication skills 0.89
need analytical skills 0.86
is good job 0.77
use excel 0.76
need good communicators 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(banker, use excel)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(banker, use excel)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(banker, use excel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(accountant, need good writing skills)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(accountant, need analytical skills)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(accountant, need communication skills)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(accountant, need communication skills)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(accountant, need analytical skills)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(accountant, need communication skills)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(accountant, need analytical skills)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(accountant, need communication skills)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(accountant, use excel)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(accountant, need good communicators)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(accountant, use excel)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(accountant, need good communicators)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(accountant, need analytical skills)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(accountant, use excel)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(accountant, is good job)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(accountant, is good job)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(accountant, need good communicators)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(accountant, use excel)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(accountant, is good job)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(accountant, is good job)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(accountant, need good communicators)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(accountant, need good writing skills)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(accountant, need good writing skills)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(accountant, need good writing skills)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(banker, use excel)