accumulator: has quality function

Related concepts

Parents	device Weight: 0.56 , item Weight: 0.54 , equipment Weight: 0.51 , unit Weight: 0.50 , system Weight: 0.45
Siblings	thermistor Weight: 0.32 , electronic device Weight: 0.32 , vacuum tube Weight: 0.32 , compressor Weight: 0.31 , electric motor Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality function	1.00
has quality good	0.78
has quality bad	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(accumulator, has quality function)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(accumulator, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(accumulator, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(accumulator, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(accumulator, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(compressor, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(accumulator, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(accumulator, has quality function)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(accumulator, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(accumulator, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(compressor, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(compressor, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(accumulator, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(accumulator, has quality function)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(accumulator, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(accumulator, has quality good)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(accumulator, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(accumulator, has quality bad)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(accumulator, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(accumulator, has quality good)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(accumulator, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(accumulator, has quality bad)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(accumulator, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(accumulator, has quality good)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(accumulator, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(accumulator, has quality bad)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(accumulator, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(accumulator, has quality good)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(accumulator, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(accumulator, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(accumulator, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(accumulator, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(accumulator, has quality function)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(accumulator, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(accumulator, has quality function)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(accumulator, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(device, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(accumulator, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(accumulator, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(compressor, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(accumulator, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(device, has quality good)