accuracy: be important in communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.68
, quality
Weight: 0.68
, attribute
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.61
Siblings integrity
Weight: 0.34
, speed
Weight: 0.34
, consistency
Weight: 0.34
, sensitivity
Weight: 0.34
, frequency
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in communication 1.00
be important in effective communication 0.94
be achieved in effective data communication system 0.82
be achieved in data communication system 0.81
be important to intps 0.77
be important at work 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important at work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(consistency, be important at work)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(consistency, be important at work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(accuracy, be important in communication)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be achieved in effective data communication system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(accuracy, be achieved in effective data communication system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be achieved in data communication system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in effective communication)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be achieved in effective data communication system)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(accuracy, be achieved in data communication system)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be achieved in data communication system)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(accuracy, be achieved in effective data communication system)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important to intps)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(accuracy, be important in effective communication)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important in effective communication)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important to intps)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(accuracy, be important to intps)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(accuracy, be achieved in data communication system)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important in effective communication)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important to intps)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important at work)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(accuracy, be important at work)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important at work)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important at work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important in communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(consistency, be important at work)