acorn: be bad year

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nut
Weight: 0.63
, story
Weight: 0.59
, organization
Weight: 0.58
, group
Weight: 0.56
Siblings macadamia nut
Weight: 0.35
, pecan
Weight: 0.34
, fairy tale
Weight: 0.33
, crab apple
Weight: 0.33
, hazelnut
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad year 1.00
be big year 0.88
fall year 0.85
be small year 0.81
has quality bad 0.79
be smaller year 0.79
last long time 0.76
last time 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nut, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(acorn, be bad year)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(nut, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(nut, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(crab apple, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nut, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(acorn, be bad year)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(crab apple, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(crab apple, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(acorn, be bad year)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(acorn, fall year)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(acorn, be big year)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(acorn, be small year)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(acorn, fall year)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(acorn, be big year)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(acorn, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(acorn, last time)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(acorn, fall year)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(acorn, be smaller year)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(acorn, last long time)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(acorn, fall year)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(acorn, be smaller year)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(acorn, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(acorn, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(acorn, be small year)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(acorn, last time)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(acorn, be big year)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(acorn, be small year)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(acorn, be smaller year)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(acorn, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(acorn, last time)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(acorn, last time)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(acorn, last long time)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(acorn, be big year)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(acorn, be small year)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(acorn, be smaller year)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(acorn, last long time)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(acorn, last long time)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(acorn, be bad year)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(acorn, be bad year)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(nut, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(crab apple, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(acorn, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(nut, has quality bad)