acorn: be edible in state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nut
Weight: 0.63
, story
Weight: 0.59
, organization
Weight: 0.58
, group
Weight: 0.56
Siblings macadamia nut
Weight: 0.35
, pecan
Weight: 0.34
, fairy tale
Weight: 0.33
, crab apple
Weight: 0.33
, hazelnut
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be edible in state 1.00
is edible 0.97
be edible in natural state 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(nut, is edible)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(acorn, be edible in state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(acorn, be edible in state)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(nut, is edible)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(acorn, be edible in state)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(nut, is edible)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(nut, is edible)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(acorn, be edible in state)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(acorn, be edible in state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(acorn, be edible in state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(acorn, be edible in state)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(acorn, be edible in state)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(acorn, is edible)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(acorn, be edible in state)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(acorn, is edible)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(acorn, be edible in state)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(acorn, be edible in natural state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(acorn, be edible in state)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(acorn, is edible)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(acorn, be edible in state)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(acorn, be edible in natural state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(acorn, be edible in state)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(acorn, be edible in natural state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(acorn, be edible in state)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(acorn, be edible in natural state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(acorn, be edible in state)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(acorn, is edible)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(acorn, be edible in state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(acorn, be edible in state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(acorn, be edible in state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(acorn, be edible in state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(acorn, be edible in state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(acorn, be edible in state)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(nut, is edible)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(acorn, be edible in state)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(nut, is edible)