acoustic guitar: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electric guitar
Weight: 0.85
, stringed instrument
Weight: 0.79
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.79
, percussion instrument
Weight: 0.75
, instrument
Weight: 0.72
Siblings flute
Weight: 0.64
, mandolin
Weight: 0.56
, accompaniment
Weight: 0.51
, bass guitar
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is more expensive 0.94
be more expensive than electric 0.80
is cheap 0.79
cost more 0.76
be from japan expensive 0.76
is attractive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(musical instrument, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(electric guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(instrument, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(electric guitar, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(acoustic guitar, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(instrument, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(electric guitar, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(musical instrument, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(electric guitar, is more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(electric guitar, is more expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(electric guitar, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(instrument, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(musical instrument, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(flute, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bass guitar, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(mandolin, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(bass guitar, cost more)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(musical instrument, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(electric guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(instrument, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(electric guitar, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(acoustic guitar, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(mandolin, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mandolin, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(bass guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(bass guitar, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(flute, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(flute, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(bass guitar, cost more)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(bass guitar, cost more)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(acoustic guitar, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(acoustic guitar, be more expensive than electric)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(acoustic guitar, be more expensive than electric)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(acoustic guitar, be more expensive than electric)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, be more expensive than electric)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(acoustic guitar, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(electric guitar, is more expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(instrument, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(electric guitar, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(musical instrument, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(flute, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mandolin, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bass guitar, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(bass guitar, cost more)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(instrument, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(electric guitar, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(musical instrument, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(acoustic guitar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(electric guitar, is more expensive)