acquisition: is interesting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents development
Weight: 0.69
, share
Weight: 0.64
, agreement
Weight: 0.63
, business activity
Weight: 0.63
Siblings deal
Weight: 0.65
, purchase
Weight: 0.62
, takeover
Weight: 0.50
, merger
Weight: 0.36
, partnership
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is interesting 1.00
is funny 0.77
be important in counselling 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(development, be important in counselling)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(acquisition, is interesting)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(acquisition, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(development, be important in counselling)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in counselling)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(merger, is interesting)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(development, be important in counselling)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(acquisition, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(acquisition, is interesting)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(acquisition, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(merger, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(merger, is interesting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(acquisition, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(acquisition, is interesting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(acquisition, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(acquisition, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, is interesting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(acquisition, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(acquisition, is interesting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(development, be important in counselling)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(merger, is interesting)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(acquisition, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(development, be important in counselling)