acrylic: be better than wood

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.69
, resin
Weight: 0.67
, plastic
Weight: 0.66
, option
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.56
Siblings silicone
Weight: 0.36
, polyethylene
Weight: 0.36
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.35
, pvc
Weight: 0.35
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than wood 1.00
be better than plywood 0.84
be better than glass 0.83
be considered better than glass 0.82
be more expensive than glass 0.79
be more popular than wool 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(acrylic, be better than wood)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(plastic, be better than wood)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better than wood)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(plastic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be better than wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(acrylic, be better than wood)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(acrylic, be more popular than wool)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be more popular than wool)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be more popular than wool)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be more expensive than glass)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be more expensive than glass)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(acrylic, be more expensive than glass)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(acrylic, be more popular than wool)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be better than glass)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(acrylic, be better than glass)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(acrylic, be more expensive than glass)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be better than plywood)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be considered better than glass)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(acrylic, be considered better than glass)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be better than glass)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(acrylic, be better than plywood)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(acrylic, be better than glass)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(acrylic, be considered better than glass)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be considered better than glass)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(acrylic, be better than plywood)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be better than plywood)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be better than wood)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(acrylic, be better than wood)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(plastic, be better than wood)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(plastic, be better than wood)