acrylic: is smart material

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.69
, resin
Weight: 0.67
, plastic
Weight: 0.66
, option
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.56
Siblings silicone
Weight: 0.36
, polyethylene
Weight: 0.36
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.35
, pvc
Weight: 0.35
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is smart material 1.00
is smart 0.88
is good material 0.88
is material 0.85
be considered material 0.82
be considered synthetic material 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(acrylic, is smart material)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(plastic, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(acrylic, is smart material)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(plastic, is material)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(plastic, is good material)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good material)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is material)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be considered material)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is material)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pvc, is material)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(acrylic, is smart material)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(plastic, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(acrylic, is smart material)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(pvc, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(pvc, is material)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(fiberglass, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is material)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(fiberglass, be considered material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, be considered material)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(acrylic, is smart material)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(acrylic, is smart)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(acrylic, is smart)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, is smart)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(acrylic, is material)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(acrylic, be considered material)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(acrylic, is smart)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(acrylic, is good material)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(acrylic, be considered synthetic material)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(acrylic, is material)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be considered material)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be considered synthetic material)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(acrylic, is good material)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(acrylic, is good material)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(acrylic, is material)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(acrylic, be considered material)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(acrylic, be considered synthetic material)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, is good material)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, is material)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be considered material)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be considered synthetic material)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, is smart material)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(acrylic, is smart material)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(plastic, is material)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(plastic, is good material)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(pvc, is material)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fiberglass, is material)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(fiberglass, be considered material)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(plastic, is material)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(acrylic, is smart material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(plastic, is good material)