acting: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents craft
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.58
, performance
Weight: 0.57
, job
Weight: 0.56
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.32
, exercising
Weight: 0.32
, singing
Weight: 0.32
, puppet
Weight: 0.31
, speaking
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(speaking, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(exercising, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(puppet, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(singing, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(puppet, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(speaking, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(speaking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(speaking, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(puppet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(puppet, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(singing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(singing, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(puppet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(puppet, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(exercising, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(exercising, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(speaking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(speaking, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(acting, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(acting, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(acting, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(acting, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(acting, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(acting, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(acting, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(puppet, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(puppet, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(speaking, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(exercising, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(speaking, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(acting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(singing, has quality good)