activist: oppose safe food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents member
Weight: 0.60
, author
Weight: 0.58
, organization
Weight: 0.56
Siblings lawyer
Weight: 0.71
, blogger
Weight: 0.66
, scientist
Weight: 0.66
, judge
Weight: 0.65
, founder
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
oppose safe food 1.00
oppose safe cheap food 0.96
oppose food 0.93
oppose cheap food 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(activist, oppose safe food)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(activist, oppose safe food)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(activist, oppose safe food)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(activist, oppose safe cheap food)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(activist, oppose safe food)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(activist, oppose safe cheap food)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(activist, oppose safe food)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(activist, oppose safe cheap food)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(activist, oppose safe food)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(activist, oppose food)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(activist, oppose safe food)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(activist, oppose food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(activist, oppose safe food)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(activist, oppose food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(activist, oppose safe food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(activist, oppose cheap food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(activist, oppose safe food)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(activist, oppose cheap food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(activist, oppose safe food)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(activist, oppose food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(activist, oppose safe food)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(activist, oppose safe cheap food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(activist, oppose safe food)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(activist, oppose cheap food)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(activist, oppose safe food)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(activist, oppose cheap food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(activist, oppose safe food)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(activist, oppose safe food)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(activist, oppose safe food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(activist, oppose safe food)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(activist, oppose safe food)