activity: harm quality of water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business activity
Weight: 0.91
, property
Weight: 0.62
, third party
Weight: 0.59
, crime
Weight: 0.58
Siblings sexual activity
Weight: 0.80
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.67
, spending
Weight: 0.66
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.66
, drug use
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
harm quality of water 1.00
harm environment 0.90
affect water quality 0.87
harm productivity of soil 0.83
harm productivity 0.83
affect quality 0.81
affect quality of life 0.80
impacts air quality 0.79
be be harmful 0.78
pollute water air 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(activity, harm quality of water)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(activity, harm quality of water)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(crime, affect quality of life)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(activity, harm quality of water)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect quality of life)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(activity, harm quality of water)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(drug use, be be harmful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, affect quality of life)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(activity, harm quality of water)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(activity, harm quality of water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(activity, harm quality of water)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(drug use, be be harmful)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(drug use, be be harmful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(activity, harm quality of water)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(activity, harm quality of water)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(activity, harm quality of water)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(activity, harm productivity of soil)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(activity, harm quality of water)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(activity, harm productivity of soil)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(activity, harm quality of water)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(activity, harm productivity of soil)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(activity, harm quality of water)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(activity, harm productivity of soil)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(activity, harm quality of water)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(activity, harm quality of water)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(activity, harm quality of water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(activity, harm quality of water)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(activity, harm quality of water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(activity, harm quality of water)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, affect quality of life)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(activity, harm quality of water)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(drug use, be be harmful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(activity, harm quality of water)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, affect quality of life)