actor: be appear at theater

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.66
, performer
Weight: 0.64
, artist
Weight: 0.63
, famous person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings politician
Weight: 0.66
, villain
Weight: 0.61
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.57
, kim
Weight: 0.54
, eric
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
be appear at theater 1.00
appear in movie 0.88
be at theater 0.87
be work in theater 0.86
work in theater 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(performer, be at theater)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(actor, be appear at theater)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(performer, be at theater)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(performer, be at theater)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(performer, be at theater)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(actor, be appear at theater)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(actor, be appear at theater)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(actor, appear in movie)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(actor, be at theater)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(actor, be work in theater)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(actor, work in theater)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(actor, work in theater)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(actor, be work in theater)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(actor, be at theater)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(actor, be at theater)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(actor, be work in theater)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(actor, work in theater)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(actor, work in theater)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(actor, be at theater)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(actor, be work in theater)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(actor, appear in movie)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(actor, appear in movie)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(actor, appear in movie)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(actor, be appear at theater)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(actor, be appear at theater)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(performer, be at theater)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(actor, be appear at theater)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(performer, be at theater)