actor: be at show

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.66
, performer
Weight: 0.64
, artist
Weight: 0.63
, famous person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings politician
Weight: 0.66
, villain
Weight: 0.61
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.57
, kim
Weight: 0.54
, eric
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at show 1.00
show his work 0.85
wants to watch television show 0.82
star in television show 0.81
be associate with talk show 0.79
star in broadway show 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(artist, show his work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(actor, be at show)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(celebrity, be associate with talk show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(actor, be at show)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(celebrity, be associate with talk show)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(artist, show his work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(artist, show his work)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, be associate with talk show)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(artist, show his work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(actor, be at show)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(celebrity, be associate with talk show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(actor, be at show)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(actor, be at show)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(actor, wants to watch television show)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(actor, star in broadway show)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(actor, wants to watch television show)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(actor, wants to watch television show)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(actor, star in television show)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(actor, star in television show)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(actor, star in broadway show)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(actor, star in television show)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(actor, wants to watch television show)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(actor, star in television show)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(actor, star in broadway show)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(actor, star in broadway show)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(actor, be at show)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(actor, be at show)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(artist, show his work)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(celebrity, be associate with talk show)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(artist, show his work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(actor, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(celebrity, be associate with talk show)