actor: look better in movies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.66
, performer
Weight: 0.64
, artist
Weight: 0.63
, famous person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings politician
Weight: 0.66
, film maker
Weight: 0.64
, villain
Weight: 0.61
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.57
, ethel waters
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
look better in movies 1.00
look in movies 0.96
get in movies 0.91
do movies 0.91
do bad movies 0.91
be in bad movies 0.90
make movies 0.90
be in movies 0.90
move in movies 0.88
make terrible movies 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(actor, look better in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(villain, be in movies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(actor, look better in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(villain, be in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(villain, be in movies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(actor, look better in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(actor, look better in movies)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(actor, look better in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(actor, be in movies)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(actor, look better in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(actor, be in movies)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(actor, look better in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(actor, be in movies)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(actor, look better in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(actor, get in movies)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(actor, look better in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(actor, get in movies)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(actor, look better in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(actor, get in movies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(actor, look better in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(actor, look in movies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(actor, look better in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(actor, look in movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(actor, look better in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(actor, look in movies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(actor, look better in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(actor, be in movies)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(actor, look better in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(actor, get in movies)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(actor, look better in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(actor, look in movies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(actor, look better in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(actor, look better in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(actor, look better in movies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(actor, look better in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(actor, look better in movies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(actor, look better in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(villain, be in movies)