actress: get in good movies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.68
, star
Weight: 0.63
, celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, film
Weight: 0.61
Siblings actor
Weight: 0.38
, dancer
Weight: 0.36
, movie star
Weight: 0.36
, singer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
get in good movies 1.00
get in movies 0.97
make bad movies 0.96
make movies 0.93
look better in movies 0.93
get paid less than actors 0.76
look good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(actor, get in movies)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(actor, look better in movies)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(movie star, look good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(actor, get in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(actor, get in movies)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(actor, look better in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(actor, look better in movies)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(movie star, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(movie star, look good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(actress, get in good movies)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(actress, get in movies)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(actress, get in movies)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(actress, make bad movies)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(actress, get in movies)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(actress, make bad movies)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(actress, make bad movies)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(actress, make movies)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(actress, make movies)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(actress, make movies)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(actress, look better in movies)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(actress, look better in movies)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(actress, look better in movies)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(actress, make bad movies)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(actress, get in movies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(actress, make movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(actress, look better in movies)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(actress, get paid less than actors)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(actress, get paid less than actors)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(actress, get paid less than actors)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(actress, look good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(actress, look good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(actress, look good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(actress, look good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(actress, get in good movies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(actress, get in good movies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(actor, get in movies)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(actor, look better in movies)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(actress, get in good movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(movie star, look good)