actress: get paid less

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.68
, star
Weight: 0.63
, celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, film
Weight: 0.61
Siblings actor
Weight: 0.38
, dancer
Weight: 0.36
, movie star
Weight: 0.36
, singer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid less 1.00
get paid 0.93
is paid 0.90
get paid less than actors 0.89
make less than actors 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(celebrity, get paid)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(actress, get paid less)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(celebrity, is paid)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(actress, get paid less)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(celebrity, get paid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(celebrity, is paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, is paid)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(movie star, is paid)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(singer, get paid)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(actor, get paid)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(movie star, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(celebrity, get paid)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(actress, get paid less)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(celebrity, is paid)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(actress, get paid less)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(movie star, get paid)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(movie star, get paid)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(singer, get paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(singer, get paid)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(actor, get paid)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(movie star, is paid)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(movie star, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(actress, get paid less)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(actress, get paid less than actors)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(actress, get paid less than actors)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(actress, is paid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(actress, is paid)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(actress, make less than actors)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(actress, make less than actors)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(actress, make less than actors)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(actress, is paid)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(actress, get paid less than actors)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(actress, make less than actors)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(actress, is paid)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(actress, get paid)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(actress, get paid)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(actress, get paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(actress, get paid less)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(celebrity, get paid)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(celebrity, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(singer, get paid)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(movie star, is paid)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(movie star, get paid)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(actor, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(celebrity, get paid)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(actress, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(celebrity, is paid)