actress: get paid less than actors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.68
, star
Weight: 0.63
, celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, film
Weight: 0.61
Siblings actor
Weight: 0.38
, dancer
Weight: 0.36
, movie star
Weight: 0.36
, singer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid less than actors 1.00
make less than actors 0.95
get paid less 0.89
get paid 0.82
refer as actors 0.81
is paid 0.80
get in good movies 0.76
get in movies 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(celebrity, get paid)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(actress, get paid less than actors)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(celebrity, is paid)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(actress, get paid less than actors)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(celebrity, get paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(celebrity, is paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, is paid)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(singer, get paid)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(actor, get paid)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(movie star, get paid)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(movie star, is paid)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(actor, get in movies)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(celebrity, get paid)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(actress, get paid less than actors)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(celebrity, is paid)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(actress, get paid less than actors)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(actor, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(actor, get in movies)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(movie star, get paid)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(movie star, get paid)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(singer, get paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(singer, get paid)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(actor, get paid)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(movie star, is paid)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(movie star, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(actress, get paid less than actors)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(actress, make less than actors)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(actress, make less than actors)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(actress, make less than actors)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(actress, make less than actors)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(actress, refer as actors)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(actress, get in movies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(actress, get in movies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(actress, get in movies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(actress, refer as actors)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(actress, refer as actors)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(actress, get in good movies)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(actress, get in good movies)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(actress, get in good movies)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(actress, get paid less)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(actress, get paid less)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(actress, get paid less)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(actress, refer as actors)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(actress, get in movies)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(actress, is paid)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(actress, is paid)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(actress, get in good movies)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(actress, is paid)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(actress, is paid)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(actress, get paid)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(actress, get paid)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(actress, get paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(actress, get paid less than actors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(celebrity, get paid)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(celebrity, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(singer, get paid)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(movie star, get paid)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(actor, get paid)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(actor, get in movies)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(movie star, is paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(celebrity, get paid)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(actress, get paid less than actors)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(celebrity, is paid)