actress: have perfect skin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.68
, star
Weight: 0.63
, celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, film
Weight: 0.61
Siblings actor
Weight: 0.38
, dancer
Weight: 0.36
, movie star
Weight: 0.36
, singer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have perfect skin 1.00
has physical part skin 0.84
have shiny smooth hair 0.78
have smooth hair 0.77
have shiny hair 0.76
has physical part hair 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(movie star, has physical part hair)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(movie star, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(movie star, has physical part hair)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(actress, have perfect skin)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(actress, has physical part skin)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(actress, has physical part skin)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(actress, has physical part hair)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(actress, have smooth hair)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(actress, have smooth hair)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(actress, have smooth hair)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(actress, has physical part hair)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(actress, has physical part skin)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(actress, have shiny smooth hair)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(actress, have smooth hair)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(actress, have shiny smooth hair)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(actress, has physical part hair)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(actress, have shiny smooth hair)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(actress, have shiny hair)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(actress, have shiny smooth hair)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(actress, have shiny hair)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(actress, have shiny hair)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(actress, have shiny hair)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(actress, has physical part skin)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(actress, has physical part hair)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(actress, have perfect skin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(actress, have perfect skin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(actress, have perfect skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(movie star, has physical part hair)