actress: look better in movies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.68
, star
Weight: 0.63
, celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, film
Weight: 0.61
Siblings actor
Weight: 0.38
, dancer
Weight: 0.36
, movie star
Weight: 0.36
, singer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
look better in movies 1.00
get in good movies 0.93
get in movies 0.91
make bad movies 0.90
make movies 0.90
look good 0.83
look same 0.79
make less than actors 0.76
look young 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(actor, look better in movies)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(actor, get in movies)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(movie star, look good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(actor, look young)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(movie star, look young)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(actor, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(actor, look better in movies)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(actor, get in movies)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(actor, get in movies)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(movie star, look good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(movie star, look good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(movie star, look young)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(movie star, look young)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(actor, look young)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(actor, look young)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(actress, look better in movies)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(actress, make bad movies)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(actress, make bad movies)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(actress, make bad movies)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(actress, get in movies)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(actress, get in movies)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(actress, get in movies)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(actress, make movies)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(actress, get in good movies)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(actress, make movies)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(actress, make movies)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(actress, get in good movies)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(actress, get in good movies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(actress, make bad movies)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(actress, get in movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(actress, make movies)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(actress, get in good movies)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(actress, make less than actors)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(actress, make less than actors)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(actress, make less than actors)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(actress, look same)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(actress, look same)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(actress, make less than actors)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(actress, look same)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(actress, look young)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(actress, look young)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(actress, look young)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(actress, look young)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(actress, look good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(actress, look same)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(actress, look good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(actress, look good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(actress, look good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(actress, look better in movies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(actress, look better in movies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(actor, look better in movies)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(actor, get in movies)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(movie star, look good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(movie star, look young)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(actress, look better in movies)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(actor, look young)