actress: refer as actors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.68
, star
Weight: 0.63
, celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, film
Weight: 0.61
Siblings actor
Weight: 0.38
, dancer
Weight: 0.36
, movie star
Weight: 0.36
, singer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
refer as actors 1.00
make less than actors 0.83
get paid less than actors 0.81
refer to themselves 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(actress, refer as actors)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(actress, refer as actors)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(actress, refer as actors)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(actress, make less than actors)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(actress, refer as actors)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(actress, make less than actors)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(actress, refer as actors)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(actress, make less than actors)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(actress, refer as actors)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(actress, refer to themselves)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(actress, refer as actors)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(actress, refer to themselves)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(actress, refer as actors)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(actress, refer to themselves)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(actress, refer as actors)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(actress, get paid less than actors)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(actress, refer as actors)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(actress, get paid less than actors)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(actress, refer as actors)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(actress, get paid less than actors)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(actress, refer as actors)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(actress, refer to themselves)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(actress, refer as actors)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(actress, make less than actors)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(actress, refer as actors)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(actress, get paid less than actors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(actress, refer as actors)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(actress, refer as actors)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(actress, refer as actors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(actress, refer as actors)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(actress, refer as actors)