adelaide: be covered in smoke

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, city
Weight: 0.58
, club
Weight: 0.48
, town
Weight: 0.45
, location
Weight: 0.44
Siblings sydney
Weight: 0.34
, perth
Weight: 0.34
, auckland
Weight: 0.34
, brisbane
Weight: 0.34
, melbourne
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be covered in smoke 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(perth, be covered in smoke)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(sydney, be covered in smoke)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(adelaide, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(sydney, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(sydney, be covered in smoke)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(adelaide, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(perth, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(perth, be covered in smoke)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(adelaide, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(adelaide, be covered in smoke)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(adelaide, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(adelaide, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, be covered in smoke)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(adelaide, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(adelaide, be covered in smoke)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(perth, be covered in smoke)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sydney, be covered in smoke)