administration: be important in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents authority
Weight: 0.66
, program
Weight: 0.63
, proposal
Weight: 0.62
, official
Weight: 0.62
Siblings czar
Weight: 0.42
, administrator
Weight: 0.34
, plan
Weight: 0.33
, council
Weight: 0.33
, state police
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in business 1.00
be required in business 0.85
be important companies have 0.82
be important in services 0.79
be important in public services 0.78
be important in society 0.77
be important in government 0.77
be important in organization 0.77
be important in education 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(authority, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(administration, be important in business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(authority, be important in government) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(administration, be important in business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(authority, be important in public services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(administration, be important in business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(authority, be important in services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(administration, be important in business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(proposal, be required in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(administration, be important in business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(authority, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(administration, be important in business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(proposal, be required in business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(authority, be important in services)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(authority, be important in society)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(authority, be important in public services)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(authority, be important in government)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(authority, be important in organization)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(proposal, be required in business)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(authority, be important in organization)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(authority, be important in government)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(authority, be important in society)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(authority, be important in public services)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(authority, be important in services)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(plan, be important companies have)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(proposal, be required in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(administration, be important in business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(authority, be important in services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(administration, be important in business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(authority, be important in public services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(administration, be important in business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(authority, be important in government) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(administration, be important in business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(authority, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(administration, be important in business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(authority, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(administration, be important in business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(plan, be important companies have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(plan, be important companies have)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(administration, be important in business)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(administration, be important in education)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(administration, be important in education)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(administration, be important in education)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(administration, be important in education)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(administration, be important in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(administration, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(proposal, be required in business)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(authority, be important in services)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(authority, be important in society)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(authority, be important in public services)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(authority, be important in government)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(authority, be important in organization)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(plan, be important companies have)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(proposal, be required in business)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(authority, be important in services)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(authority, be important in society)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(authority, be important in public services)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(authority, be important in government)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(administration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(authority, be important in organization)