administrator: be appointed by merit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.68
, authority
Weight: 0.67
, program
Weight: 0.61
, person
Weight: 0.61
Siblings supervisor
Weight: 0.64
, principal
Weight: 0.59
, provost
Weight: 0.59
, office worker
Weight: 0.35
, manager
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be appointed by merit 1.00
be appointed 0.86
is appointed 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(administrator, be appointed by merit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(administrator, be appointed by merit)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(administrator, be appointed by merit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(administrator, is appointed)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(administrator, be appointed by merit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(administrator, be appointed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(administrator, be appointed by merit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(administrator, be appointed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(administrator, be appointed by merit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(administrator, is appointed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(administrator, be appointed by merit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(administrator, is appointed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(administrator, be appointed by merit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(administrator, be appointed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(administrator, be appointed by merit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(administrator, be appointed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(administrator, be appointed by merit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(administrator, is appointed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(administrator, be appointed by merit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(administrator, be appointed by merit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(administrator, be appointed by merit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(administrator, be appointed by merit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(administrator, be appointed by merit)