admission: be in cs specialist determined

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents statement
Weight: 0.63
, fee
Weight: 0.63
, condition
Weight: 0.61
, event
Weight: 0.59
Siblings registration
Weight: 0.33
, tuition
Weight: 0.32
, movie ticket
Weight: 0.32
, declaration
Weight: 0.31
, concert hall
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in cs specialist determined 1.00
be in cs specialist 0.97
be for cs 0.85
be for cs calculated 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(admission, be in cs specialist determined)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(tuition, be for cs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(admission, be in cs specialist determined)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tuition, be for cs calculated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(admission, be in cs specialist determined)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(tuition, be for cs calculated)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(tuition, be for cs calculated)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(admission, be in cs specialist determined)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(tuition, be for cs)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(tuition, be for cs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(admission, be in cs specialist determined)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(admission, be in cs specialist determined)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(admission, be in cs specialist determined)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(admission, be in cs specialist)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(admission, be in cs specialist determined)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(admission, be in cs specialist)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(admission, be in cs specialist determined)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(admission, be in cs specialist)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(admission, be in cs specialist determined)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(admission, be in cs specialist)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(admission, be in cs specialist determined)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(admission, be in cs specialist determined)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(admission, be in cs specialist determined)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(admission, be in cs specialist determined)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(admission, be in cs specialist determined)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(admission, be in cs specialist determined)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(tuition, be for cs calculated)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(admission, be in cs specialist determined)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(tuition, be for cs)