adverb: be bad writing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents word
Weight: 0.55
, phrase
Weight: 0.53
, form
Weight: 0.48
, modifier
Weight: 0.47
, thing
Weight: 0.47
Siblings f word
Weight: 0.34
, preposition
Weight: 0.33
, phrasal verb
Weight: 0.33
, proper noun
Weight: 0.33
, adjective
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad writing 1.00
be used writing 0.91
be bad in fiction 0.79
enhance process writing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(adjective, be bad writing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(adjective, enhance process writing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(adjective, be used writing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(adjective, be used writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(adjective, be used writing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(adjective, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(adjective, be bad writing)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(adjective, enhance process writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(adjective, enhance process writing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(adverb, be bad writing)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(adverb, be used writing)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(adverb, be used writing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(adverb, be used writing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(adverb, enhance process writing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(adverb, enhance process writing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(adverb, enhance process writing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(adverb, be bad in fiction)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(adverb, be bad in fiction)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(adverb, be bad in fiction)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(adverb, be bad in fiction)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(adverb, enhance process writing)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(adverb, be used writing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(adverb, be bad writing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(adverb, be bad writing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(adjective, be used writing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(adjective, be bad writing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(adverb, be bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(adjective, enhance process writing)